Legal Opinion
Oswald v. Jeraj
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1946No. 30548PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The single question presented by this record is whether the allegation's of the petition and the evidence introduced in support thereof entitled the plaintiff to have her cause submitted to a jury.
The authorities are not in harmony on the question whether the owner of an apartment building owes a duty to the tenants thereof to remove from the common approaches thereto ice and snow caused by natural elements. In some states it is held that he does owe such a duty. See Reardon v. Shimelman, 102 Conn., 383, 128 A., 705, 39 A. L. R., 287; Thompson v. Resnik, 85 N. H., 413, 159 A., 355; Boyle v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Looney v. McLeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Roman v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Nash v. WebberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- McGinley v. Alliance Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Porter v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Thomas v. Panco Management of Maryland, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Phelps v. Consolidated Equities Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Langley Park Apartments, SEC. H., Inc. v. LundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.