Legal Opinion
Fox v. U. S. Parole Commission
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 20, 1981No. 80-3044PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
James Fox, having paid the necessary fee, has filed with the Clerk of the Court this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that the Parole Commission improperly rescinded his “effective date of parole.” A rule to show cause issued to which respondents filed an Answer and Return. Petitioner subsequently filed his Traverse and supplemental material thereto. Having examined all pleadings and attachments, the Court makes the following findings and Order.
Petitioner does not refute these facts as set out in the Answer and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richard L. Dye v. United States Parole Commission, United States of America, and United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Lee Autry Robinson v. C. L. Benson, Warden, Leavenworth Federal PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- McClanahan v. MulcromeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Hearn v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- United States v. Truman TalkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Patuxent Institution Board of Review v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Vincent Fardella v. William L. Garrison, Warden Cecil C. McCall Chairman, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Armando Torres-Macias v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- James W. Lewis v. Art Beeler, Warden and the United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Iuteri v. NardozaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.