McClanahan v. Mulcrome
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing appellant McClanahan’s petition for writ of mandamus, which seeks to compel reinstatement of a presumptive parole date. The- relevant facts follow.
Appellant, who is presently incarcerated in the United States Penitentiary at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richard L. Dye v. United States Parole Commission, United States of America, and United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Susan Dawson v. Cecil Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, and the United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Truman TalkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kansas Board of Regents v. Pittsburg State University ChapterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Bridge v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Vincent Fardella v. William L. Garrison, Warden Cecil C. McCall Chairman, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- James W. McQuerry v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- David A. Staege, Jr. v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.