Legal Opinion
Armando Torres-Macias v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1984No. 83-5703PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Torres-Macias appeals from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Following his convictions for participation in large drug smuggling conspiracies, the United States Parole Commission (the Commission) granted Torres-Macias an effective parole date of July 16, 1981. In April of 1981, the Commission requested additional information on Torres-Macias from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Based on that information, the Commission decided to reconsider his parole. See 28 C.F.R. § 2.28(f). On reconsideration, it concluded Torres-Macias should serve the full term of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Iuteri v. NardozaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Vincent Fardella v. William L. Garrison, Warden Cecil C. McCall Chairman, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- McClanahan v. MulcromeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Allen v. HaddenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- William J. Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- James L. Tatum v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Carmine Romano v. Benjamin F. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- James W. Lewis v. Art Beeler, Warden and the United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.