Legal Opinion

Richard L. Dye v. United States Parole Commission, United States of America, and United States Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1977No. 76-2116PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

Richard Lee Dye seeks review of the Memorandum and Order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court declined to grant relief from the Parole Board’s denial of Dye’s application for parole.

Appellant appeared before the United States Parole Board (now Parole Commission) in February of 1976. He was denied parole based on the following reasons:

“Your offense behavior has been rated as moderate severity. You have a salient factor score of 4. You have been in cus tody a total of 18 months. Guidelines…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Joseph Menechino v. Russell G. Oswald, as Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole, New Yorkstate Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Robert J. Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, Walter Dunbar, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Harold Martin Brest v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director, Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Spring-Field, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Ronald Leroy Schuemann v. Colorado State Board of Adult Parole J. D. MacFarlaneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Clarence W. Walker v. Prisoner Review Board, James R. Irving, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Martin B. Steinberg v. Police Court of Albany, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Nathaniel Errol Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API