Legal Opinion
James W. Lewis v. Art Beeler, Warden and the United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1991No. 90-6299PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises the following four questions:
1. Can evidence that was known by investigative agencies but not by the United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”) at the time of a prisoner’s initial parole determination be considered “new information” sufficient for the Commission to reopen the prisoner’s ease under 28 C.F.R. § 2.28(f)?
2. Once a prisoner’s case is reopened, can the Commission consider information in a sentencing transcript where
A. the transcript, though previously unseen by the Commission, was not the basis for reopening;
B. the information pertains…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Hackett v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Arnold I. Kramer v. O.C. Jenkins, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Sam S. Misasi v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bowers v. KellerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Russ v. PerrillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Peltier v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Gometz v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. RosenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.