Legal Opinion

Fort v. County of Cumberland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 2012No. COA11-758PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.

Petitioners-appellants, Samuel and Doris Fort, Julia Katherine Faircloth, and Raeford B. Lockamy, II (collectively “petitioners”) appeal the trial court’s order concluding, inter alia, that intervenorrespondent-appellee TigerSwan, Inc.’s (“TigerSwan”) proposed training facility is a permitted land use under respondent County of Cumberland’s zoning ordinance. After careful review, we affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.

Background

Petitioners began the underlying action by appealing to the Cumberland County Board of Adjustment (the “Board”) the decision of the county’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Milk Commission v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Mangum v. Raleigh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Baker v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ray v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Cherry v. WiesnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Jeffries v. Cty. of HarnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Fort v. County of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Willowmere Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Hous.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API