Legal Opinion
Cherry v. Wiesner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 16, 2016No. 15-155PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
*340 Synopsis of Opinion
Gail Wiesner ("respondent") lives across the street from the single-family "modernist" design home of Louis Cherry and Marsha Gordon ("petitioners") in Raleigh's Oakwood neighborhood. Oakwood is a designated historic district, where the design of new construction must be approved by the Raleigh Historic Development Commission ("the *341 Commission"). As required by the rules of the historic district, before building on their vacant lot, petitioners applied for a certificate of appropriateness to build their new home ("the Cherry-Gordon house"). When the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Mangum v. Raleigh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Terry's Floor Fashions, Inc. v. Crown General Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boyce v. N.C. State BarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Byron v. Synco Props., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- The Cherry Cmty. Org. v. The City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Little River, LLC v. Lee Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Aldridge v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.