Legal Opinion
Fort v. County of Cumberland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided August 19, 2014No. COA14-93PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, Judge.
Respondents TigerSwan, Inc., and Cumberland County appeal an order of the trial court, reversing a decision made by Cumberland County’s Board of Adjustment that the TigerSwan facility is permitted in the A1 Zoning District and remanding with instructions to revoke the site plan approval and zoning permit for the TigerSwan facility. Based on the reasons stated herein, we reverse the order of the trial court.
I. Background
The Cumberland County zoning ordinance at issue in this appeal was originally adopted on 3 July 1972, revised 20 June 2005, and amended on 18 April 2011 (“the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Perkins v. Arkansas Trucking Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Morris Communications Corp. v. City of Bessemer City Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- Ayers v. Board of Adjustment for RobersonvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- JWL Investments, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hampton v. Cumberland Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Hampton v. Cumberland Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Hampton v. Cumberland Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Starlites Tech Corp. v. Rockingham Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- Starlites Tech Corp. v. Rockingham Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.