Legal Opinion

Baker v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1991No. 246PA91PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The first question presented in this appeal is whether the plaintiff has standing to bring this action. The defendants, relying on Nicholson v. Education Assistance Authority, 275 N.C. 439, 168 S.E.2d 401 (1969) and Watkins v. Wilson, 255 N.C. 510, 121 S.E.2d 861 (1961), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 46, 8 L.Ed.2d 398 (1962), argue that the plaintiff has not been injured by the action of the defendants in this case, and for this reason the plaintiff does not have standing to bring the action. The record shows that the plaintiff went to the meeting of the Twenty-fourth District Bar…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Nicholson v. State Education Assistance AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Bush v. HolmesSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  3. State ex rel. McCrory v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Wilson v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Coley v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API