Legal Opinion

Ray v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 22, 2013No. 21PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

Petitioners here seek to block a Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) with a Wal-Mart supercenter in Baltimore City, but have been stymied by Circuit Court and appellate rulings against them on the threshold question of standing. Although the test to show standing has been established in Maryland for more than half a century, the issue continues to generate appellate cases. That is partly because the test is fact-sensitive and is not readily reduced to a set of rules.

As we have explained, to have standing to challenge a zoning reclassification, a person’s property interest “must be such that he…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Bryniarski v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Sugarloaf Citizens' Ass'n v. Department of EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Maryland Overpak Corporation v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. DuBay v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. County Council v. Zimmer Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Kendall v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Anne Arundel County v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1300 v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API