Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of Riverside
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
J. — The question before us is whether streetlighting assessments come within Proposition 218’s exemption for assessments imposed exclusively to finance the maintenance and operation of streets and sidewalks. We will hold that they do and therefore that preexisting streetlighting assessments are “grandfathered” under Proposition 218.
I
Statutory Background
Proposition 218 can best be understood against its historical background, which begins in 1978 with the adoption of Proposition 13. “The purpose of Proposition 13 was to cut local property taxes. [Citation.]” (County of Los…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Greene v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.