Greene v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
In this case, a flood control district proposed a storm drainage fee to fund improvements intended to prevent flooding and flood damage. Pursuant to article XIII D, section 6 of the California Constitution, 1 enacted as part of Proposition 218 in 1996, the fee was voted on by the property owners in the district, and obtained the needed majority. One property owner challenged the legality of the election, a challenge that, after various iterations, came down to this: the ballots were not secret, because the ballot contained on its face the name and address of the voter, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Plantier v. Ramona Mun. Water Dist.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Owens v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Capistrano Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.