Legal Opinion

Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 2001No. S082645PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review to decide whether a city ordinance imposing an inspection fee on private landlords violates article XIII D of the California Constitution (article XIII D), added by initiative measure, Proposition 218, in 1996. We conclude that it does not.

In July 1998, the City of Los Angeles put into effect the Los Angeles Housing Code. It is codified as article 1 of chapter XVI of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (§ 161.101 et seq.). Later that month, plaintiffs sued the city for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that Los Angeles Municipal Code section 161.352,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Greene v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Richmond v. Shasta Community Services DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API