Legal Opinion
Prisuda v. General Casualty Co. of America
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1956PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
The appellant, General Casualty Company of America, contends that at the time of the collision, George Rogers, the driver of the Allen car, was not an additional assured under the omnibus coverage clause of the policy. That clause reads as follows:
“Definition of ‘Insured! With respect to the insurance for bodily injury liability and for property damage liability the unqualified word ‘insured’ includes the named insured and also includes any person while using the automobile and any person or organization legally responsible for the use thereof, provided the actual use of the automobile is by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Laughnan v. GriffithsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Duncan v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- Schimke v. Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of HermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Maurer v. FesingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Olander v. KlapproteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by31 opinions
- Germanotta v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Lukaszewicz v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Baesler v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.