Legal Opinion

Laughnan v. Griffiths

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1955PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The defendant Lea was not an occupant of either of the two automobiles involved in the collision of January 25, 1952, which resulted in plaintiffs’ injuries. Neither was he the owner of either vehicle. However, in the complaints and affidavits filed in behalf of the plaintiffs it is sought to impute the driver Smith’s negligence to Lea on the ground that Smith at the time of the accident was the employee, agent, or partner of Lea.

Counsel for Lea urges on this appeal that there were no facts presented to the trial court in any of the affidavits filed •in support of, or in opposition to, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StehlekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hanson v. HalvorsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Putman v. DeinhamerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Vlasis v. Cheese Makers Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Associated Hospital Service, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. McCluskey v. ThranowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API