Duncan v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
At the outset, it must be stated that the effect of the discrepancy between the applicant’s occupation as described on the face of the application and that as described in the medical examiner’s report on the reverse side of the application, is not in issue. Nor is the question whether the applicant was insurable under the rules of the company presented as an issue.
The sole question presented for our determination is whether the appellee insurance company is liable under the terms and provisions of its receipt, since the applicant died subsequently to the issuance of the receipt but before…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Copelin-Mohn, Inc. v. Buckeye Union Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by32 opinions
- Allen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Gaunt v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Simpson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Leube v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.