Legal Opinion
Lukaszewicz v. Concrete Research, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1969No. 311PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
The question on this appeal is, to whom must the coverage of an automobile liability policy be extended by sec. 204.30 (3), Stats., 1 or whom does this section make an additional or unnamed insured? The language of the section and the language of the automobile liability policy issued by Zurich in this respect is not identical.
The statute requires that the indemnity provided to the named insured by an automobile liability policy must be extended in the same manner and under the same provisions to any person “while riding in or operating any automobile” described in the policy when the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. CoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ainsworth v. BergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Pavelski v. RoginskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- American Motors Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. DriscollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Davison v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- McNeil v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.