Legal Opinion

Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1957PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The following issues are raised on this appeal :(1) Is there any credible evidence to sustain the jury’s finding of causal negligence on the part of Hollis, driver of the M. G. C. unit?(2) Was the plaintiff Henthorn causally negligent as a matter of law ?(3) Did the trial court err in refusing to submit a question as to Henthorn’s management and control?(4) Did the trial court err in excluding certain expert testimony offered by defendants?(5) Did the filing of an SR-21 by defendant Insurance Company make it liable upon its policy to the extent of the limits of such policy?

In order to pass on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Laughnan v. GriffithsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Anderson v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Prisuda v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rabata v. DohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hays v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Kreyer v. FARMERS'CO-OPERATIVE LUMBER CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API