Legal Opinion
Larson v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 2011No. A125887PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BANKE, J.
I. Introduction
Appellants Norman T. Larson, San Francisco Apartment Association, San Francisco Association of Realtors, Coalition for Better Housing, Round Hill Pacific, and John Zanghi (appellants) challenge provisions of Proposition M, a voter-approved initiative amending San Francisco’s Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (hereafter, the Rent Ordinance). Proposition M augmented the antiharassment provisions of the ordinance by *1272expanding the definition of “decrease in [housing] services” to include a list of “bad faith” acts by landlords and their…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Carrico v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Coyne v. De Leo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Steiner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Taylor v. Nu Digital Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.