Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Queen City Coach Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The trial court refused to dismiss the action as in case of nonsuit, but set aside tbe verdict as a matter of law without finding any facts or pointing out any error. The plaintiff excepted and appealed. In Likas v. Lackey, 186 N. C., 398, we held that an exception to an order setting aside a verdict as a matter of law cannot be sustained unless error is shown, because the order is presumed to be correct. Ordinarily the rule there stated will be observed; but in this case the briefs of the parties were prepared on the assumption that the reason assigned for vacating the verdict is the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riley v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Likas v. LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Akin v. First National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Ward v. CruseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API