Legal Opinion

Likas v. Lackey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The case was first tried at the February term and resulted in a verdict for the defendants. "Without assigning any reason at the time, the court of its own motion set aside the verdict, and the defendants excepted and appealed. The case on appeal was duly served, and there was no exception or eounterstatement. At the March term the case was again called for trial, and the defendants objected to proceeding on the ground that their appeal was pending; whereupon his Honor held that the appeal was dilatory and did not constitute a sufficient cause for continuánce. To this ruling the defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cole v. . LawsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Jarrett v. Trunk Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Powers v. . City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Drewry-Hughes Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Pruett v. Charlotte Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. In Re Will of PuettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Query v. Gate City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API