Legal Opinion

Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint Venture

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1981No. 8022SC542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

We find that the trial judge erred in dismissing the case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). No motion by defendants to dismiss for failure to state a claim can be found in the record. The error is harmless, however, because matters outside the pleadings were considered, and the trial judge correctly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants pursuant to Rule 56. We make the rather technical point above because we feel it is important to stress that if a 12(b)(6) motion had been made and considered solely on the pleadings, plaintiff could have stated a cause of action if the facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toone v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Aaser v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Williams v. MickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Graves v. Charlotte Lodge No. 392 Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Kerns v. Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Small v. McKennan HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. C.S. v. SophirNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API