Legal Opinion

Aaser v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1965No. 275PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The Coliseum is an arena for the holding of exhibitions and athletic events owned by the city of Charlotte and administered for it by the Authority to produce revenue and for the private advantage of the compact community. A city is engaging in a proprietary function when it operates such an arena, or leases it to the promoter of an athletic event, and when it operates refreshment stands in the corridors of the building for the sale of drinks and other items to the patrons of such an event. Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328, 106 S.E. 2d 564; Millar v. Wilson, 222 N.C. 340, 23 S.E. 2d 42.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hughes v. St. Louis National League Baseball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Rawson v. Massachusetts Operating Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Wash. State Major League Baseball Stadium Pfd v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Hedrick Ex Rel. Hedrick v. TigniereSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API