Williams v. Mickens
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The question presented here is this: Does failure to remove the switch key render the owner of an automobile liable for the negligent operation thereof by a thief who steals it?
If the owner is liable for injury inflicted by the thief at the next street crossing, there appears no reason why liability should not extend to the next town, the next county, or the next state. If leaving the key in the switch creates liability, leaving it on the seat, or on the owner’s desk where a thief could easily find it, would seem also to imply liability. If liability exists on the day of the theft, does it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Campbell v. . LaundrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- McNair v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Campbell v. Model Steam LaundrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Ward v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Welling v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Stone v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Sailor v. OhldeWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Pinyan v. SettleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Bryant v. Atlantic Car Rental, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.