Graves v. Charlotte Lodge No. 392 Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, as a patron of defendant’s Bingo game, was an invitee to whom it owed a duty to exercise ordinary care to keep its premises in a reasonably safe condition. It was not an insurer of her safety. Case v. Cato’s, Inc., 252 N.C. 224, 113 S.E. 2d 320. No inference of actionable negligence on the part of defendant arose from the mere fact that plaintiff fell on its premises as a result of stepping on a plug which had fallen from one of its chairs. Fanelty v. Jewelers, 230 N.C. 694, 55 S.E. 2d 493. The transcript discloses no fact or circumstance suggesting that the plug had been on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Revis v. OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Case v. Cato's of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Schwingle v. . KellenbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Leonard v. Baker's Shoe Store, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burns v. Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Newsom v. ByrnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Samuel v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Fearing v. WestcottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.