Legal Opinion

Baird v. Loeffler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1982No. 81-724PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question of whether R. C. 2305.11(B), as amended effective July 28, 1975, acts to bar a claim of a minor whose cause of action accrued in 1972.

In pertinent part, R. C. 2305.11 provides:

*534“(A) An action for * * * malpractice, including an action for malpractice against a physician, podiatrist, or a hospital, * * * shall be brought within one year after the cause thereof accrued * * * .
“(B) In no event shall any medical claim against a physician, podiatrist, or a hospital be brought more than four years after the act or omission constituting the alleged malpractice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Smith v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cook v. MatvejsOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Vance v. St. Vincent Hospital & Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Schwan v. Riverside Methodist HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Lundblad v. CelesteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Opalko v. Marymount Hospital, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API