Legal Opinion

Opalko v. Marymount Hospital, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1984No. 82-1680PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue raised before this court concerns whether R.C. *642305.11(B) violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions.

Our recent opinion in Schwan v. Riverside Methodist Hospital (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 300, examined this precise issue and explored the language contained in R.C. 2305.11(B). The Schwan opinion stated that a portion of this statutory section created an irrational classification in contravention of the Equal Protection Clause found in Section 2, Article I of the Ohio Constitution.

R.C. 2305.11(B) provides:

“In no event shall any medical claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Schwan v. Riverside Methodist HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cook v. MatvejsOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Baird v. LoefflerOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Meros v. University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Morris v. SavoyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Alicea v. Córdova IturreguiSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  5. Antoon v. Cleveland Clinic Found. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API