Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Flowers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1972No. 71-782PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, authorizes the enactment of laws establishing, administering and regulating a state workmen’s compensation fund. Under its provisions, such laws may determine both the “terms and conditions upon which payment shall be made [from the fund].” In accordance with that language, the General Assembly enacted R. C. 4123.84, which, until December 11, 1967, permitted the payment of compensation on meritorious claims against the fund, if “ # * * within two years after the injury or death:

“(1) Written application has been made to the Industrial Commission…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Clutter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Melnyk v. Cleveland ClinicOhio Supreme Court · 1972

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API