Legal Opinion
Lundblad v. Celeste
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1989No. Nos. 87-3651, 87-3689PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Steven Lundblad filed two actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (“ODNR”) and various Ohio state officials in their individual capacities. The defendants moved to dismiss Lundblad’s actions, now consolidated, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The district court denied the motions of all the defendants except that of Ronald James, holding that Lundblad stated a claim under the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment, the first amendment, and the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Triplett Grille, Inc., D/B/A the Back Door v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Planned Parenthood Of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Planned Parenthood v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Beil v. Lakewood Engineering and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Downtown Auto Parks, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee and William R. Drew, Commissioner of the Department of City DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.