Legal Opinion

Vance v. St. Vincent Hospital & Medical Center

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1980No. 80-8PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Resolution of this cause is dependent upon interpretation of the medical malpractice statute of limitations, R. C. 2305.11, as amended in July 1975, by Am. Sub. H. B. No. 682, and of its effect on potential malpractice plaintiffs who are minors over the age of 10.1

*38The parties disagree as to the effect of that part of R. C. 2305.11(B) which reads:

“The limitations in this section for filing such a malpractice action against a physician, podiatrist, or hospital apply to all persons regardless of legal disability and notwithstanding section 2305.16 of the Revised Code***.”2

Appellants argue that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Melnyk v. Cleveland ClinicOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Henry v. Central National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Stewart v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Morris v. SavoyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Schwan v. Riverside Methodist HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API