Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 1990No. J88-0186; CA A61569PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant seeks reversal of her conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The trial court denied her motion to suppress evidence found during a search of her purse, holding that the search was conducted with her consent. We affirm.

Reedsport police officer Boggs was patrolling on Highway 101 shortly before 8:00 p.m. on November 21, 1987, when he observed the passenger of a 1968 Chevrolet ducking down as if to prevent Boggs from seeing him. Boggs did a radio check on the vehicle and discovered that there was an outstanding felony warrant 1 for its registered owner. He…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. FloresOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. LerchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. State v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. Arroyo-SoteloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. WinnMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API