Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1992No. 89CR461; CA A64892PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*72DEITS, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, arguing that the stop of his car was illegal, that the officer’s questions during the traffic stop exceeded the permissible scope of the stop and that the officer did not have consent to search his suitcase. We affirm.

We take the facts from the trial court’s findings. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487, 443 P2d 621 (1968). On the evening of June 6, 1989, Officer Anderson was in a marked patrol unit, patrolling 1-5 near…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. OlaizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. MesaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BinnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. Arroyo-SoteloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. FikesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API