Legal Opinion

State v. Arroyo-Sotelo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 1994No. 89CR0051; CA A78912PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*292DEITS, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a schedule II controlled substance (cocaine). ORS 475.992-(4)(b). He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized following the consensual search of his car. We reverse.

On October 18, 1988, at approximately 9:50 p.m., Officer Anderson stopped the car that defendant was driving for failure to maintain a single lane, a traffic infraction. After concluding that defendant was not under the influence of intoxicants, Anderson told defendant that he was going to issue him a warning and asked for his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. RestrepoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API