Legal Opinion

State v. Gaither

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 1985No. C84-02-30761; CA A33448PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns as error the court’s denial of his motion to suppress “all evidence which was the product of an illegal search” that the police made, including an aluminum foil “bindle” containing heroin. The state concedes that, if the search for the heroin was illegal, defendant’s subsequent confession was also inadmissible. The court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to suppress, and we affirm.

The court made no findings of historical fact, but they are not in dispute. Officer Sviler stopped…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. FloresOregon Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. FreundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. Arroyo-SoteloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. LandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. AuerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API