Legal Opinion
State v. Arpi
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 1, 2003No. AC 22448PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*750 Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, Luis Aipi, appeals from the denial of his motion to open the judgment and to withdraw his plea of guilty to the charge of possession of a controlled substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (c). On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) found that General Statutes § 54-95b prohibits opening criminal judgments more than four months after the date of judgment, (2) denied his motion to open the judgment and to withdraw his guilty plea in violation of Practice Book § § 39-26 and 39-27, and (3) deprived him of his constitutional…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Ayala v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Barlow v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Williams v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. IralaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re ColletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Smith-Groh, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission of GreenwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. BegleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. IsabelleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. EastmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.