Legal Opinion
State v. Irala
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 5, 2002No. AC 19874PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, Fanny Irala,1 appeals from the trial court’s judgments of conviction, which were rendered following the denial of her motions, filed pursuant to Practice Book § 39-27,2 to withdraw her pleas of nolo contendere to two counts of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-*501124. On appeal, the defendant claims that by denying her motions, the court abused its discretion because her pleas were made unknowingly and involuntarily. In support of that claim, the defendant asserts that (1) the court’s plea canvass was defective because it…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. PorterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. AquinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.