Legal Opinion
Barlow v. Lopes
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 12, 1986No. 12686PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether, under the standards established in Staton v. Warden, 175 Conn. 328, 398 A.2d 1176 (1978), the petitioner knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. After a jury trial, the petitioner, Arthur R. Barlow, was convicted of second degree assault in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2). Subsequent to his conviction but prior to sentencing, he agreed that he would plead guilty under the Alford doctrine1 to two unrelated charges and would waive his right to appeal the assault conviction in return for an entry of nolle…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. KluttzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Housing Authority v. LamotheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. ReillyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.