Ayala v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether, under our rules of practice, a plaintiff may maintain an action against a defendant whose identity is unknown to the plaintiff and is therefore referred to as “John Doe.” Because we determine that the plaintiffs claim is moot, however, we do not reach this issue and dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The relevant factual and procedural background is as follows. On August 25,1992, the automobile in which the plaintiff, William Ayala, was a passenger was involved in an accident at the intersection of Broad Street and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Gagnon v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Sadlowski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Community Collaborative of Bridgeport, Inc. v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.