Legal Opinion

State v. Eastman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 8, 2005No. AC 25821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

The defendants in this consolidated appeal, Brian R. Eastman, Jr., John N. Scasino and Sergio Urzua, appeal from the judgments of the trial court rendered following the denial of their motions to dismiss for insufficiency of cause. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly found that a town ordinance requiring persons to obtain a permit from the town chief of police to discharge a firearm within the limits of the municipality did not intrude on the state’s right to regulate hunting. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

The following facts and procedural history are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Williams v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. State v. AquinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. State v. ArpiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re William D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. State v. BegleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API