Legal Opinion

Oak Knoll Broadcasting Corp. v. Hudgings

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1969No. Civ. 33779PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Respondent Hugh Hudgings is the husband of Ethelyn Hudgings, one of the defendants in an action brought against Orange Empire Productions, Inc. and others by plaintiff-appellant. In connection with such action, a writ of attachment was levied against certain monies of Ethelyn on deposit with the Studio City Branch of Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Association. Thereafter respondent filed a third party claim (Code Civ. Proc., § 689), declaring that he had an interest therein as Ethelyn’s husband and demanding the release of the funds. More specifically, it was alleged that the monies were the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Lawler v. SolusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Beck v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansford v. LassarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1985
  3. In re BraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Olsen v. Santa Barbara's Gracious Living, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API