Legal Opinion

Beagle v. Walden

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1997No. 95-2409PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, has certified the following question to this court pursuant to S.Ct. Prac.R. XVIII:

“Is Ohio Revised Code § 3937.18(A)(2) unconstitutional on any grounds under the facts of this case, including those stated by Plaintiff[?]”

We respond to the certified question as follows: We do not find R.C. 3937.18(A)(2) unconstitutional on any ground argued by the plaintiff.

The statement of facts as presented to this court in the federal district court’s certification order follows:

“This case involves a claim by Plaintiff,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Walston v. NevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Simmons-Harris v. GoffOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2004

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API