Legal Opinion
Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police Department
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1994No. 93-731PublishedCited by 277 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Appellants challenge the constitutionality of R.C. 2744.02(B)(4)1 under the due process and equal protection provisions of the Ohio and United States Constitutions, and the right to remedy provision of the Ohio Constitution. We conclude that the statute is constitutional and affirm the court of appeals.
Statutes are presumed to be constitutional unless shown beyond a reasonable doubt to violate a constitutional provision. State ex rel. Dickman v. Defenbacher (1955), 164 Ohio St. 142, 57 O.O. 134, 128 N.E.2d 59, paragraph one of the syllabus.
*353Appellants argue that R.C. 2744.02(B)(4) violates the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by277 opinions
- Laurie Range v. Kenneth DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Emil Ewolski v. City of BrunswickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Udine Ellis, Guardian for Lateasha Pendergrass v. Cleveland Municipal School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Harris v. City of CirclevilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.