State ex rel. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State Employment Relations Board
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} This appeal tests the validity of an amendment to R.C. 3318.31, which the State Employment Relations Board (“SERB”) had applied to exclude certain employees from the collective-bargaining process. Because we conclude that the amendment to R.C. 3318.31 violated the one-subject rule of the Ohio Constitution, we affirm the court of appeals’ judgment granting the Ohio Civil Service Employees Association (“OCSEA”) a writ of mandamus.
*123I
{¶ 2} Pursuant to its collective-bargaining agreement with the state of Ohio, relator-appellee, OCSEA, is the exclusive bargaining representative for certain…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Assn. v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- In re NowakOhio Supreme Court · 2004
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.