Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State Employment Relations Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2004No. 2003-1010PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} This appeal tests the validity of an amendment to R.C. 3318.31, which the State Employment Relations Board (“SERB”) had applied to exclude certain employees from the collective-bargaining process. Because we conclude that the amendment to R.C. 3318.31 violated the one-subject rule of the Ohio Constitution, we affirm the court of appeals’ judgment granting the Ohio Civil Service Employees Association (“OCSEA”) a writ of mandamus.

*123I

{¶ 2} Pursuant to its collective-bargaining agreement with the state of Ohio, relator-appellee, OCSEA, is the exclusive bargaining representative for certain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Assn. v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In re NowakOhio Supreme Court · 2004

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API