Legal Opinion
Simmons-Harris v. Goff
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1999No. 97-1117PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
The court of appeals ruled on six substantive constitutional issues. We will address each of them in turn. We conclude that the current School Voucher Program generally does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or the Establishment Clause of Section 7, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, and does not violate the School Funds Clause of Section 2, Article VI of the Ohio Constitution, the Thorough and Efficient Clause of Section 2, Article VI of the Ohio Constitution, or the Uniformity Clause of Section 26, Article II of the Ohio…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mixon v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Tanya Mixon, Denise Thomas, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. The State of Ohio and Michael White, Mayor of the City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.