Jordin v. State

KAUTZ, Justice.

[¶ 1] Phillip Timothy Jordin was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit aggravated burglary, conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery, conspiracy to commit aggravated assault and battery, and conspiracy to commit theft. Mr. Jordin appeals three of his convictions, arguing the State failed to present sufficient evidence at trial. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] Mr. Jordin raises one issue in this appeal:

There is insufficient evidence to support the convictions of conspiracy to commit aggravated burglary, aggravated robbery, and aggravated assault [and battery].

FACTS

[¶ 3] In the early…