Legal Opinion

Doherty v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2006No. 05-24PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] A jury found Brett P. Doherty guilty of one count of felony possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. He appeals from his judgment and sentence alleging insufficient evidence to support the conviction and prosecutorial misconduct. Mr. Doherty also claims the district court improperly denied his request for a new trial and contends that he was denied a fair sentencing hearing. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Mr. Doherty presents four issues for review:

I. Was the evidence sufficient to prove [Mr. Doherty’s] “actual” or “constructive” possession of methamphetamine and was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mazurek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Talley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Frederick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API