Derek Earl Hill v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, Justice.
[T1] A jury found Derek Earl Hill guilty of five counts of reckless endangering, three counts of aggravated assault, and one count of eluding police. He appeals his conviction claiming there was insufficient evidence of aggravated assault, the district court abused its discretion when it admitted evidence of law enforcement officers' reactions to a fired shot, and there was prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments, . We affirm. .
ISSUES
[12] 1. Was. the evidence presented at trial sufficient to prove .Mr. Hill threatened to use the weapon he was carrying?
2, Did the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- People v. BlueIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- Browder v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. HaymakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Gayler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Danell Blevins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Lance David Bean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.