Wehr v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The most troublesome issue in this case is whether the record discloses sufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy to deliver controlled substances. Closely related to that difficult issue is the issue of whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior purchases of controlled substances by Paul C. Wehr (Wehr) from a co-conspirator. In addition, Wehr strenuously argues he was deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We hold the evidence of prior purchases of controlled substances from the co-conspirator was relevant and admissible in this…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.