Legal Opinion
Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, LLP
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 22, 2011No. 2:08-mj-00119PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Accenture’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 210), Accenture’s Motion to Exclude Wellogix’s Proposed Expert Witness Kendyl Roman (Doc. No. 212), and Accenture’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 206). Upon considering the Motions, all responses thereto, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Motion for Summary Judgment must be granted in part and denied in part, the Motion to Exclude Wellogix’s Proposed Expert Witness Kendyl Roman must be denied, and the Motion to Dismiss must be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jacked Up, L.L.C. v. Sara Lee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Wright v. Minardi (In re Minardi)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2015
- Aspen Technology, Inc. v. M3 Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Engenium Solutions, Inc. v. Symphonic Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.